Copyright © 2018 mysportscience. Mysportscience Ltd is a limited company (registered in England & Wales 9443573)

© 2023 by "This Just In". Proudly created with Wix.com

How intestinal absorption adapts to diet and the implications

March 25, 2017

The capacity of the intestine to absorb carbohydrate is dependent on carbohydrate intake in the diet (for complete discussion read the recent review I wrote in Sports Medicine (1)). Similarly, the capacity to absorb is dependent on fat in the diet. If carbohydrate intake is increased, the capacity to absorb carbohydrate is increased. These adaptations can be very specific. For example, if glucose is increased the capacity to absorb glucose is increase, but the capacity to absorb fructose is unaltered. If the fructose content of the diet is increased the absorptive capacity for fructose is increased, but not glucose. Similarly with fat: If fat content of the diet is increased the capacity to absorb fat is increased without affecting the capacity to absorb carbohydrate.

 

These are interesting findings for athletes, especially because it has been demonstrated that absorption is the limiting factor for carbohydrate use from exogenous sources (ingested carbohydrate).

Glucose is absorbed through a protein that facilitates the transport across the cell wall of the intestine. This protein is called SGLT1: the sodium dependent glucose transporter 1. When the glucose content of the diet is increased for several days, the number of these transporters increases and the absorption of glucose increases in parallel. Fructose is transported by GLUT5 and something similar may happen to GLUT5 transporters.

 

Implications

If carbohydrate intake is reduced the opposite will happen. The number of transporters decreases and les glucose will be absorbed. Thus, any athlete who reduces dietary carbohydrate intake consistently will have a lower capacity to absorb glucose. When this same athlete now enters an endurance event and wants to use carbohydrate in the form of drinks, gels or energy bars, the absorption of the carbohydrate could be poor. This, in turn, could result in increased stomach fullness, bloating and increased gastro-intestinal problems.

 

This theory seems to be backed up by anecdotal evidence. Athletes who are carbohydrate restricting or athletes with very low energy intake often report more gastro-intestinal problems during events, especially when using these carbohydrate containing products.

 

Although there is merit in increasing the capacity to oxidise fat by sometimes training with low carbohydrate availability, having a low carbohydrate intake every day is not advised. It is more likely that the combination of low carbohydrate intake on some days, and high carbohydrate intakes might promote adaptations of fat metabolism as well as adaptations to carbohydrate metabolism and absorption. Improving the absorptive capacity of the gut is one of several methods we have available to train the gut. Read more here about training the gut for athletes.

 

So the periodised approach will help to increase fat oxidation, whilst maintaining the capacity to absorb carbohydrate. This means that on race day, one may burn more fat, spare some carbohydrate and deliver additional carbohydrate without causing gastro-intestinal problems.

 

 

References

 

These  papers are available to download for FREE:

 

1. Jeukendrup AE. Training the gut for athletes. Sports Medicine 2017

 

2. Jeukendrup AE. Periodized nutrition for athletes. Sports Medicine 2017

 

Related:

 

Training the gut for athletes

 

Periodised nutrition for athletes

 

Carbohydrate recommendations during exercise

 

Is more carbohydrate better? And how much is too much?

 

Carbohydrate mouth rinse

 

Carb mixes and benefits

 

Not all carbs are equal ‪

 

Carbohydrate and soccer

 

 

 

 

Please reload

About me
  • Facebook App Icon
  • Twitter App Icon
  • LinkedIn App Icon
Please reload

Related posts
Recent posts
Please reload

Search By Tags